Cleantech venture capital is an increasingly prominent sustainable finance solution that plays a particularly important role in financing early-stage companies developing sustainable solutions. This article features content from the 2024 report “Beyond the Boom: A Critical Examination of Current Barriers in Cleantech Venture Capital Funding”, jointly published by the Center for Sustainable Finance and Private Wealth (CSP) Singapore and the Centre for Governance and Sustainability at the National University of Singapore. The original report sought to highlight the aim of advancing sustainable development and finance globally, with a specific focus on Asia and Singapore. This set the stage for an in-depth exploration of the barriers impeding cleantech venture capital funding, emphasizing the importance of long-term investment strategies and collaboration among key stakeholders to address issues such as misalignment with cleantech needs, investor knowledge gaps, and regulatory challenges.
The initial enthusiasm surrounding cleantech VC promised a green revolution, confident to transform the energy landscape with sustainable, innovative technologies. Between 2006 and 2011, VC investments in cleantech soared, driven by a collective aspiration to mitigate climate change and capitalize on the anticipated shift away from fossil fuels (Giorgis et al., 2022). However, this period of intense investment was followed by a significant downturn, with many VC firms witnessing their cleantech portfolios underperform or fail outright (Eilperin, 2012). Several key factors contributed to this failure, offering crucial lessons for current and future investments in the sector.
Unsuitability of the VC Model
Cleantech investments inherently involve long development timelines, substantial capital requirements, and complex regulatory environments. The traditional VC model, characterized by shorter investment horizons and expectations of rapid growth and high returns, proved ill-suited to the realities of cleantech ventures. Gaddy et al. (2017) highlighted this mismatch, noting that the VC approach did not accommodate the time-consuming processes and high capital needs of cleantech startups, leading to a lack of sustainable exit options and thin profit margins.
External Market Forces
The period also witnessed significant external market forces that adversely affected cleantech investments. Fluctuating prices of silicon, a key component in solar panels, and the availability of cheap natural gas emerged as formidable challenges. The 2008 financial crisis further exacerbated the situation, drying up available capital and redirecting investor focus away from cleantech. The rapid ascent of China’s solar industry, benefiting from substantial government support and lower production costs, created competitive pressures that many Western cleantech ventures could not withstand (Eilperin, 2012).
Lack of Policy Support and Market Demand
The cleantech sector’s growth was significantly hampered by the loss of policy support and weak demand for green products. Van den Heuvel and Popp (2023) underscored the critical role of demand-side policies in cleantech success, pointing out that financial constraints and the absence of strong market demand for green technologies limited the potential for outsized returns, deterring VC investment.
Technological Breakthroughs and Scalability Issues
The expectation of rapid, disruptive a viable VC investment target (Giorgis et al., 2022). The cleantech VC boom and bust serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities and risks associated with investing in green technologies. The sector’s failure to live up to early expectations was not merely the result of market dynamics or external pressures but also a reflection of deeper structural issues within the VC model and the cleantech industry itself. As the sector undergoes a resurgence, it is imperative for investors, policymakers, and cleantech entrepreneurs to heed these lessons, adopting more nuanced and patient investment strategies that align with the unique challenges and opportunities of sustainable innovation. Therefore, it is important to understand current barriers to cleantech investments to not repeat the mistakes from the past.
Implications on Asian Wealth Holders
The rise and fall of cleantech venture capital offers crucial lessons for Asian investors seeking to capitalize on the sector's resurgence. The mismatch between the traditional VC model and the long development timelines, high capital requirements, and complex regulatory environments of cleantech highlights the need for more patient, flexible investment strategies. Additionally, external market forces, such as fluctuating raw material prices and competitive pressures from lower-cost producers like China, emphasize the importance of understanding regional dynamics and government policies. For Asian investors, aligning expectations with the reality of cleantech's scalability challenges and fostering demand-side policies will be key to navigating the sector's risks and seizing long-term opportunities in sustainable innovation. And perhaps, a blended finance approach to clean-tech financing is long in the waiting.
Learn more about the different approaches to sustainable investing in CSP SG’s Applied Sustainable Investing in Wealth Management courses, available at both a L3 (introductory) and L4 (intermediate) level. Readers interested in clean tech solutions can also attend CSP’s Carbonomics: Carbon Markets and Decarbonisation Strategies course.
References
Eilperin, J. (2012). Why the clean tech boom went bust. Wired magazine, 20.
Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B., & Wayman, L. (2017). Venture capital and cleantech: The wrong model for energy innovation. Energy Policy, 102, 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.035
Giorgis, V., Huber, T. A., & Sornette, D. (2021). ‘Salvation and profit’: deconstructing the clean-tech bubble. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852673
Van den Heuvel, M., & Popp, D. (2023). The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: Lessons from the first cleantech bubble. Energy Economics, 124, 106877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106877
You might also be interested in
A framework and real family office stories to help you identify your gaps in impact investing and how to move forward.
Due diligence on private equity and venture capital funds is a critical cornerstone.
What is the purpose of your wealth?
